A Revolution in Science Publishing, or Business as Usual?
bjoern.brembs.blog » New England Journal of Medicine – and you thought Nature was expensive?
Making Open the Default - Bjorn Brembs
bjoern.brembs.blog » Page: 13
bjoern.brembs.blog » Are we inadvertently supporting the defunding of public science?
PDF) Towards a Scientific Concept of Free Will as a Biological Trait: Spontaneous Actions and Decision-Making in Invertebrates
Academic-Led Publishing From the Experts Series: Interview with Björn Brembs
PDF) How Nature Magazine consistently prefers anecdote over data
Open Science: Flickschusterei in der digitalen Steinzeit
Björn Brembs (@brembs) | Twitter
bjoern.brembs.blog » Page: 17
bjoern.brembs.blog » No need to only send your best work to Science Magazine
News / Comments / More Impact Factor spam from Nature - blogarchive.brembs .blog
Björn Brembs on Twitter: "Excellent portrait of a true scientific hero: Elizabeth Bik (@MicrobiomDigest): "Meet this super-spotter of duplicated images in science papers" Her contributions to the integrity of the scientific record
bjoern.brembs.blog » Page: 13
PDF) The cost of the rejection-resubmission cycle
PDF) Corrigendum: Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability
Evolution of Cellular Networks: Doing away with scientific journals
![OSR098 Academic Publishing Infrastructures with Björn Brembs [EN] – Open Science Radio](http://www.openscienceradio.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/OSR098.png "OSR098 Academic Publishing Infrastructures with Björn Brembs [EN] – Open Science Radio")
OSR098 Academic Publishing Infrastructures with Björn Brembs [EN] – Open Science Radio
bjoern.brembs.blog » Even without retractions, 'top' journals publish the least reliable science
Bjoern Brembs (University of Regensburg): “The Neurogenetics of Creative Problem Solving” - YouTube
bjoern.brembs.blog » Just how widespread are impact factor negotiations?
